Humidor David Holland

Of course, this is the 'famous' Montecristo. I have smoked two of them now and I am not very impressed to say the least. The ones I have smoked and which were bought in different stores, were both awefully rolled (too tight). This appears to be a general problem with the No. 2, since I have heard it from different people. Yet, it is astonishing given the price of the cigar and its flagship status. Besides, and although it is all a matter of taste, the taste of this cigar appears simply too light for me (but this may also be a result of the drunken ;-)rollers). What I was able to taste points to a distinctive flavor though; earthy and nuts tones. It's diameter is perfect (for me). However, as a result of my experiences I would not recommend it. There are two more samples in my humidor which a leave there for one more year to ripe. If they are bad as well, it will be the end of the story.

Definitely a good cigar! Perfect draw, good binder. The taste is medium and a bit sweet and therefore good for either a late afternoon smoke or after dinner. Recommended.

This is without a doubt my favourite cigar! Each one I have smoked (which are many) was perfect! Smooth smoke, perfect draw, tones of coffee and slightly sweet. Not one to smoke during the day, but perfect after dinner in combination with a good cognac (e.g. Montifaud VSOP or Hennessey VSOP). I can not imagine that any cigar afficionado would reject this cigar. If you like the Robusto format you should certainly give this one a try.

Ths Macanudo was a bit of a disappointment. It was very light and too mild. The puff and draught were below par. Yet, it might be that this one was poorly rolled (too tight), so I should try another one soon.